Posted by: jeanlatzgriffin on: January 3, 2010
Already there is a website on how to speak the Na’vi language of the lithe blue people of Avatar’s planet, Pandora. A Google blog search turns up 87,484 hits for the name of the tribe and its language and 917,000 for Neytiri, the main Na’vi woman in the film, played by Zoë Saldaña.
A professor of astrophysics who specializes in searching for life in the universe has written an extensive piece in understandable language on the accuracy of the science in Atavar and given it mostly high grades. (One item – there is a reason everything is so blue).![]()
In its first two weeks, Avatar grossed nearly $213 million on about 7,000 screens nationwide, more than half showing the stunning 3-D version, in which fire sparks flicker and Woodsprites dance inches from the audience, and one can look deep into the lush landscape and almost ride the swooping banshees.
Outside the U.S., Avatar took in $164.5 million in five days from 64 markets, not counting Japan (opened 12/23), China (1/4) and Italy(1/15). It is showing on 1,350 screens in Russia.
President Obama and the First Lady took their daughters to see the film on New Year’s Eve while on vacation in Hawaii, in between calls regarding the Christmas Day attempted bombing of an intercontinental flight into Detroit.
All this is to say that the movie has been seen by millions of people around the globe, written about by thousands, and if we are to believe even the most skeptical media researchers, it will not only entertain and employ, but have an effect on the attitudes and behaviors of large numbers of people all over the world.
In the lingo of memetics, some people will link many of the concepts in Avatar with what they feel is a desirable way to live and pass those links, or memes, onto others.
This possible effect of movies isn’t new, but it is likely to happen much more quickly and extensively in our 2010 interconnected world that it could, for example, when Dances with Wolves presented some similar ideas in 1990 or Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner challenged racial attitudes in 1967.
Our vast access to each other’s thoughts and beliefs is the first of two new forces involved. For example, among the tweets that were flooding Twitterdom at the rate of 50 a minute at about 9 p.m. Chicago time on New Years Eve were these:
One woman from Indonesia tweeted:
“Avatar seriously owns me. I’ve never wanted to be blue and to have a tail so bad in my life.”
Another tweet, from Bali woman, included a link to a photo of the sky she had seen during an outdoor New Year’s celebration:
“They’re bubbles in the air, and suddenly I miss Eywa from Avatar.”
And a third from Canada:
“A day after Avatar this thing landed on my son! So weird! He’s been chosen by Eywa!”
Sure, some of this is joking, and many people will forget about the movie quickly. But as the discussion of Avatar’s religious, environmental, political, gender and racial dimensions continues to appear in media channels across the board, some people are being encouraged by the message of unity with nature and a Mother Spirit, while others are critical and even fearful.
Roger Ebert summed up part of the film’s impact:
“Avatar is not simply a sensational entertainment, although it is that. It’s a technical breakthrough. It has a flat-out Green and anti-war message. It is predestined to launch a cult.”
It doesn’t seem to be the environmental and anti-war messages, however, that are stirring up the most heated discussions. It’s not even the “white people as oppressors and then saviors” undertones, although those are being criticized.
It is the vibrant and deep spirituality of the Na’vi, which includes a networked nature connected to and nourished by the Mother God, Eywa, that seems to push the most buttons.
On the Op-Ed page of the New York Times, conservative columnist Ross Douthat derided the movie as another example that “pantheism has been Hollywood’s religion of choice for a generation,” and then dismissed the spirituality depicted in the film as lacking any value.
In response, Mark Stricherz, a self-proclaimed “orthodox Catholic” writing on TrueSlant, toed the company line that pantheism was heresy, but still criticized Douthat’s view and gave Avatar a nod for containing the “kernel of truth” that “nature should not be subjugated or mastered…but celebrated as an expression of God’s bounty.”
But Stricherz and others, including the writer of “Avatar inspires thoughts about our awesome future,” are clear that it is a separate, transcendent God that they prefer people see as their spiritual link, not a female Deity and a conscious, interconnected world of spiritual beings, humans, plants and animals.
The concept of interconnectedness, however, is the second force involved in the potential power of Avatar, and its movement from the fringes to the main stream is accelerating.
The Internet has a lot to do with the growing understanding and acceptance of our interconnectedness, as does the maturing of the uber-connected Millennial generation, the technology that allows virtual meetings and a new physics that includes particles and waves that can communicate with each other across miles of space.
If this were a new experience, however, it would be easy to dismiss, but that is not the case.
Director James Cameron seems to have tapped into a spiritual thread dating back 2,600 years. It waned for centuries in the West, pushed to the side by Aristotelian/Cartesian dualism and Newtonian physics, which were important in their day, only to begin to grow again in the early 20th century as quantum physics emerged and a renewed interest in the unity of spirit and creation came to the fore.
One of the more thought provoking blogs about the religious aspects of the film comes from an unexpected source. Fr. Andrew Damick, who describes himself as an orthodox Christian priest, praises Avatar for its more pagan than pantheistic philosophy, pointing out that Eywa answers prayers and the Na’vi have temples, and considers this line of thinking to also be present in more traditional religions.
“What I think is worth noting in this pagan/pantheistic view of god, man and nature,” Damick writes, “is its similarity to Orthodox Christianity.”
He could have said the same about the concepts the film shares with Taoism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sufism and the mystical traditions within Judaism and Christianity. A big, strong tent and growing.
For more about the reemergence of this philosophical concept of unity, its connection to science and Avatar’s contribution to that, please see CyberINKonline’s other blog, God Swimming in God.
Posted by: jeanlatzgriffin on: November 30, 2009
If it weren’t for the joy of what had happened a few days before, the two items at the bottom corner of an inside page of the New York Times on a recent Wednesday would be even more depressing than they are.
In what often seems to be a continuing downward spiral for print and good reporting, the Washington Post
announced it was closing its last three domestic bureaus, in New York, Chicago and Los Angeles, due to “limited resources and increased competitive pressure.” At the same time, Barnes and Noble reported a larger second quarter loss than expected, due in part to the high costs of creating the Nook, a digital reader designed to compete with Amazon’s Kindle.
Not to slam advances in communication technology, but can you really curl up with a good monitor? Perhaps they’ll include a chip with the warm, relaxing smell of bookiness to fool us into thinking it’s real.
So what was the positive news?
It was two fine pages in the New York Times on Nov. 20 and again on Nov. 22 of Chicago news – not just any Chicago news – but news provided by the type of organization that many say may be a way to save real, hold-in-you-hand newspapers and the investigative reporting that daily print journalism has dominated.
There was the word, “Chicago,” in a almost onomatopoetic typeface that made the most of its round letters, sitting atop page of great reporting and writing.
Under “Chicago” I spied welcome information: “Produced by the Chicago News Cooperative.” Wow! That sounded like one of the new nonprofit news organizations that have been popping up. A look at the “To Our Readers” memo from the NYT confirmed my guess about the new Friday and Sunday “Chicago” pages.
The brainchild of Jim O’Shea, former managing editor of the Chicago Tribune and editor of the Los Angeles Times, the cooperative is backed by Chicago public television station WTTW and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. The NYT is the first paying customer of the cooperative, which describes itself as “committed to public service, reported by journalists, guided by members.” Among its staff and contributors, I see many former friends and colleagues, all professional news men and women.
This cooperative isn’t the first of its kind. ProPublica started in 2007, the Nonprofit Investigative News Network was created in July, and a bill to give news outlets tax breaks if they become nonprofit organizations, introduced by Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), is in the Senate. President Obama has said he will consider such proposals.
But this cooperative’s connection to the New York Times, its roster of leading Chicago journalists, its inclusion of members in guiding its organization and its plans to have a digital as well as print footprint, means that it has taken a giant step forward in determining the future of good news gathering.
Kudos to all involved!